Monday, February 23, 2026

The Real Housewives of Potomac Season 10, Episode 19 Reunion Part 2: Receipts, Regret & Ruthless Shade

The Real Housewives of Potomac Season 10, Episode 19 Reunion Part 2: Receipts, Regret & Ruthless Shade


If you thought Part 1 of the reunion was messy, buckle up. Season 10, Episode 19 (Reunion Part 2) of The Real Housewives of Potomac delivered classic Potomac chaos — calculated reads, emotional confessions, and the kind of tension that makes you pause your TV and whisper, “Oh this about to get GOOD.”
With The Real Housewives of Potomac celebrating a decade of drama, this reunion felt like a referendum on the entire cast — who’s evolved, who’s deflecting, and who’s still playing chess while the others argue checkers.
And yes… the binder made its presence known.
Ashley Darby vs. Accountability: “I’m Just Being Me”
Let’s start with Ashley Darby, because she stayed in the hot seat for a good chunk of this episode.
Ashley doubled down on her season behavior, especially when it came to her commentary on Wendy Osefo and the legal drama that hovered over Wendy this year. According to Ashley, she was “just asking questions.” But the problem? The questions didn’t feel neutral — they felt pointed.
And that’s where the ladies pushed back.
Several cast members argued that Ashley plays innocent while lighting the match. It’s the classic Potomac formula: stir the pot, then sip your drink while everyone else burns. Ashley’s defense? The show has always been shady. The audience just got softer.
But here’s the thing — there’s a difference between playful shade and weaponized information. This reunion forced Ashley to confront whether she crossed that line.
Did she fully take accountability? Not exactly. But she did look rattled at times — and that’s rare.
Wendy Osefo: Calm, Controlled, and Calculated
Speaking of Wendy, she came prepared.
Wendy was far more measured than in previous seasons. Gone were the rapid-fire comebacks and visible frustration. Instead, she leaned into calm confidence. She articulated her side clearly, especially when addressing how rumors affected her family and reputation.
This wasn’t reactive Wendy. This was professor Wendy.
And that shift changed the energy. It forced the other women — especially Ashley — to either match her tone or look messy by comparison.
Gizelle’s Emotional Moment
Then came the unexpected emotional turn with Gizelle Bryant.
Gizelle opened up about personal family matters involving her father’s estate, and for a moment, the shade paused. You could see the layers drop. The usual smirk disappeared. Instead, we saw vulnerability.
Even cast members who typically clash with Gizelle softened during this segment. It was a reminder that beyond the glam, the gowns, and the confessionals, these women are navigating real-life grief and legal stress.
Potomac doesn’t always slow down long enough for sincerity — but when it does, it hits.
Jassi vs. Keiarna: New Girl Energy, Old School Aggression
Now let’s get to the sparks.
Jassi Rideaux and Keiarna Stewart clashed hard.
Jassi walked in with bold energy, ready to defend herself and re-litigate her conflicts. Keiarna wasn’t backing down either. What made this dynamic interesting was the generational shift — newer cast members bringing a more confrontational style compared to the original Potomac “smile-while-I-slice-you” approach.
The exchange felt less strategic and more explosive.
And Andy? Oh, he was grinning.
Monique’s Return & The Binder 2.0
Yes. It happened.
Monique Samuels made a surprise appearance — and she did not come empty-handed.
The binder of receipts, now iconic in Housewives history, made its dramatic return. Even if she wasn’t central to the episode’s conflict, her presence symbolized something bigger: Potomac’s legacy.
Monique’s original binder moment years ago redefined reunion warfare. So seeing her step back into that space felt nostalgic and slightly ominous.
The message? In Potomac, nobody ever really forgets.
The “Too Sensitive” Debate
One of the most layered discussions of the night centered around whether today’s cast (and audience) is “too sensitive.”
Ashley and others suggested earlier seasons were harsher — and no one blinked. But social media has changed the stakes. Cancel culture, think pieces, and online backlash now follow every shady comment.
This debate felt meta. It wasn’t just about this cast. It was about reality TV in 2026.
Are Housewives still allowed to be villains? Or do they have to self-produce to survive?
Potomac has always thrived on sharp wit and elite-level reading. But this reunion suggested the women are more cautious — and more defensive — than ever before.
Andy Cohen’s Control of the Room
Credit where it’s due: Andy Cohen did not let anyone fully escape.
He pressed Ashley repeatedly. He asked Wendy direct questions. He circled back to unresolved conflicts. He allowed emotional pauses but quickly pivoted back to drama.
The pacing felt tighter than recent reunions. There was less shouting over each other and more structured confrontation.
Which honestly? Made the reads hit harder.
Final Thoughts: Who Won Part 2?
Reunion Part 2 felt like a chess match.
Wendy gained points for composure.
Gizelle earned sympathy.
Ashley took heat but held her ground.
Jassi and Keiarna brought chaos.
Monique reminded everyone of the franchise’s power era.
No one delivered a single knockout blow — but the psychological shifts were noticeable.
The alliances are cracking. The tone is evolving. And Season 10 is clearly transitional.
Potomac isn’t falling apart — it’s recalibrating.
And if Part 2 was this layered, you already know Part 3 is about to dig even deeper.
Overall Rating: 8/10
Not the most explosive reunion episode in RHOP history — but definitely one of the most strategic. Less screaming. More positioning. More legacy talk.
And honestly? That might be more dangerous.
Because in Potomac…
The real fight isn’t the argument. It’s the narrative.
And everybody is fighting to control it.

Sunday, February 22, 2026

You Deleted Social Media… But You’re Still on YouTube? Girl, Let’s Talk.

You Deleted Social Media… But You’re Still on YouTube? Girl, Let’s Talk.


I’ve been watching YouTube day in and day out (because let’s be honest, that autoplay button is undefeated), and I keep seeing the same dramatic announcement:
“I deleted my social media. I’m free. I’m healed. I’m off the grid.”
But then… five minutes later… they upload a 27-minute YouTube video explaining why they left social media.
Pause.
Now don’t get me wrong — I support protecting your peace. I support logging off. I support mental clarity. But let’s not act brand new.
YouTube is social media.
You are still posting. You are still commenting. You are still engaging. You are still reading feedback. You are still checking analytics.
You didn’t leave social media. You switched platforms.
And that’s okay! Just say that.
The Real Issue: It’s Not the Platform — It’s the Relationship
People don’t usually leave social media because it exists. They leave because:
They were comparing themselves.
They were doom-scrolling.
They were addicted to validation.
They were overwhelmed by opinions.
They were mentally drained.
But instead of saying:
“I needed healthier boundaries.”
They say:
“I deleted social media.”
And then upload a YouTube video… with ads on.
Be honest. You restructured your access. You didn’t disappear.
YouTube Is Social Media (Let’s Be Clear)
YouTube has:
Comments
Likes
Shares
Subscribers
Algorithms
Analytics
Monetization
Community posts
Live chats
That’s social.
So if someone says they’re off social media but they’re active on YouTube, what they really mean is:
“I left Instagram/Twitter/Facebook because it wasn’t serving me.”
And that’s valid.
But let’s not act like YouTube is some underground monastery of peace and silence.
It’s just a different room in the same house.
If I Delete My Account, What Should I Do?
Now let’s flip this.
If you decide to delete your social media accounts, here’s some grounded advice:
1. Don’t announce it dramatically.
If you’re truly stepping away for peace, you don’t need applause. Just go.
When people make long speeches about leaving, sometimes it’s still about attention.
Peace is quiet.
2. Be clear about your goals.
Ask yourself:
Am I leaving because I’m triggered?
Because I’m addicted?
Because I’m distracted?
Because I need to focus on money or purpose?
Clarity helps you return healthier — or stay gone confidently.
3. Don’t replace one addiction with another.
If you delete Instagram but now spend 8 hours on YouTube, did you really change?
Switching apps isn’t healing. Changing habits is.
4. If you’re a content creator, plan strategically.
Now this part is important — especially if you’re building something (and you are).
If you make money from your content, don’t just delete everything emotionally.
Instead:
Archive posts.
Pause notifications.
Limit screen time.
Delegate.
Batch content.
Change how you engage.
You don’t burn your house down because you need fresh air. You open a window.
The Performance of “Leaving”
Let’s be honest.
Sometimes “I’m leaving social media” becomes a rebrand moment. A reset narrative. A soft-launch transformation arc.
And then three weeks later:
“I’m back. I’ve grown so much.”
It becomes content.
And again — that’s not wrong. Just be transparent.
There’s nothing wrong with stepping back. There’s nothing wrong with needing boundaries. There’s nothing wrong with monetizing your life.
But don’t act superior because you deleted Instagram while uploading daily vlogs.
We see you.
My Advice If You’re Over It
If you’re tired of watching people perform their exits, here’s what you do:
Unfollow.
Stop clicking.
Stop hate-watching.
Protect your time.
Build your own lane.
Because while they’re announcing their departure from “social media,” the algorithm is still paying them.
Focus on your own consistency instead of their contradictions.
Final Thought
Leaving social media isn’t about the app. It’s about discipline. It’s about intention. It’s about mental clarity. It’s about energy.
If you delete your account — do it quietly. If you stay — stay intentionally. If you pivot — own it.
But please…
Don’t stand in the middle of YouTube talking about how you left social media like you escaped the Matrix.
You just changed rooms.
And that’s fine.
Just say that.

Did 60 Minutes Report That Jesse Jackson Passed Away? Let’s Clear This Up.

Did 60 Minutes Report That Jesse Jackson Passed Away? Let’s Clear This Up.


This Sunday, timelines were in a frenzy.
Group chats were buzzing.
Facebook aunties were typing in all caps.
And somebody — somewhere — said that 60 Minutes reported that Jesse Jackson had passed away.
Let’s slow this down.
Because that did not happen.
Where Did This Even Start?
Anytime a legendary public figure has health challenges, the internet starts pre-writing obituaries. Jesse Jackson has had visible health struggles in recent years, including Parkinson’s disease. When cameras show him looking frail, social media does what it does best:
Speculate.
Exaggerate.
And then hit “share” without checking.
That’s how rumors are born.
Did 60 Minutes Announce His Death?
No.
There was no official report from 60 Minutes stating that Jesse Jackson has passed away.
If that had happened, every major news outlet would have confirmed it within minutes. Instead? Silence. Because it wasn’t true.
And here’s the thing — 60 Minutes often profiles historic figures, civil rights icons, and political legacies. Sometimes a reflective segment about someone’s life can feel like a memorial piece. But that does not mean the person has died.
Context matters.
Why These Rumors Spread So Fast
Let’s be real.
We are in the era of:
“I heard…”
“Somebody said…”
“It was on TV…”
“Did you see the post?”
Before you know it, a rumor becomes a headline in someone’s mind.
And when the person involved is someone as historically important as Jesse Jackson — a civil rights figure who stood alongside giants of the movement — emotions run high.
But facts still matter.
The Bigger Conversation
There’s something uncomfortable about how quickly we jump to announce someone’s passing before confirmation. Especially Black leaders. Especially elders.
Instead of celebrating legacy while people are still here, we often wait for a death rumor to trend.
Maybe the real takeaway is this:
Honor people while they’re alive.
Share their history. Discuss their impact. Teach younger generations who they are.
Without turning social media into a premature obituary board.
Final Word
As of now, Jesse Jackson is alive.
And no, 60 Minutes did not announce his passing.
Before you repost, before you panic, before you text the family group chat — check a reliable news source.
Because in 2026, misinformation travels faster than truth.
And we don’t need another “Wait… he’s not dead?” moment.
What do you think?
Did you see the rumor too? Or was this your first time hearing it?

Book & Career Review: Shailah Edmonds – From Runway to ReinventionShailah Edmonds

Book & Career Review: Shailah Edmonds – From Runway to Reinvention
Shailah Edmonds

There are models.
There are authors.
And then there are women who reinvent themselves so many times that you can’t help but respect the hustle.
Shailah Edmonds is one of those women.
From international runway model to author, jazz singer, and motivational speaker, her journey reads like something straight out of a movie. And honestly? Her memoir makes sure you feel every high heel step of it.
๐Ÿ“š Book Review: Wild Child to Couture Style
Wild Child to Couture Style
Her memoir, Wild Child to Couture Style, is part confessional, part comeback story.
What the Book Is About
The book walks us through:
Her early life and personal struggles
Breaking into the modeling industry
International runway experiences
The emotional toll of ambition
Reinventing herself through music and storytelling
This isn’t just a “I walked fashion week and everything was fabulous” story. It’s layered. It’s about resilience, identity, motherhood, reinvention, and survival in industries that can chew people up and spit them out.
Writing Style
The tone is honest and reflective. At times it feels conversational — like she’s sitting across from you saying, “Let me tell you what really happened.”
She doesn’t glamorize everything. That’s what makes it compelling.
Strengths of the Memoir
✔ Transparency about setbacks
✔ Insight into the fashion industry
✔ Personal growth arc
✔ Inspirational without feeling preachy
If I Had to Critique…
Some parts lean more inspirational than deeply detailed — readers who want heavy behind-the-scenes fashion gossip might crave more runway tea. But that’s not really the book’s mission. It’s more about transformation than scandal.
Overall rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)
๐Ÿ‘  Modeling Career Review
Before the book, before the speaking engagements, Shailah Edmonds was making waves as a runway model.
International Runway Presence
She modeled internationally, walking fashion shows and building a reputation for elegance and command. Her look is classic but powerful — tall posture, confident stride, and expressive presence.
She wasn’t just posing. She was performing.
Reinvention Factor
One of the most impressive parts of her modeling career isn’t just that she succeeded — it’s that she pivoted.
Many models fade quietly when the runway slows down. Shailah transitioned into:
Model coaching
Motivational speaking
Music performance
A one-woman show based on her life
That’s longevity.
That’s strategy.
That’s brand building.
And as someone who understands building a personal brand, you can’t ignore that level of evolution.
๐ŸŽญ Beyond Modeling: The Bigger Picture
Shailah Edmonds didn’t box herself into one lane.
She:
Writes.
Performs.
Speaks.
Coaches.
Records music.
Produces stage work.
That multidimensional approach is something creative entrepreneurs should pay attention to. She didn’t wait for the industry to call her back — she built her own stage.
Final Thoughts
If you’re looking for:
A redemption arc story
A behind-the-scenes peek at modeling life
An inspirational reinvention memoir
Proof that life doesn’t end after one career chapter
Then Wild Child to Couture Style is worth the read.
Her modeling career laid the foundation.
Her book explains the journey.
Her current creative work proves she’s still evolving.
And in an industry that loves to label women by their “prime,” that evolution might be her most powerful statement.
If you’d like, I can:
Rewrite this in your dramatic, messy, gossip-filled style ๐Ÿ˜

Erika, Accountability & The $25 Million Question: Why RHOBH Fans Are Still Divided

Erika, Accountability & The $25 Million Question: Why RHOBH Fans Are Still Divided
If there is one storyline that refuses to die on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, it’s the saga surrounding Erika Jayne and the money connected to her estranged husband’s law firm scandal.
And the question fans keep asking is simple:
Does accountability matter if you “didn’t know”?
The $25 Million Elephant in the Room
For seasons now, viewers have heard about the alleged $25 million that went to Erika’s company from her husband’s law firm. The firm, once run by powerhouse attorney Tom Girardi, collapsed under allegations that client settlement funds were misused.
Now here’s where the internet splits into two loud camps:
Camp A: “She knew.”
Camp B: “She didn’t know — but it still looks bad.”
Even people who believe Erika wasn’t some criminal mastermind still struggle with the optics. When victims are involved — burn victims, plane crash families, people waiting on settlements — emotions aren’t neutral. They’re heated.
And that’s understandable.
“Ignorance” vs. Responsibility
Let’s be real. Most viewers don’t think Erika was sitting in a back office drafting fraudulent documents. This isn’t a crime thriller.
But here’s the uncomfortable layer:
When you spend money that later turns out to have questionable origins, does “I didn’t know” erase the moral responsibility?
Legally, that’s for the courts.
But morally? That’s where reality TV becomes reality commentary.
Fans aren’t necessarily screaming for prison time. (And yes, people still bring up comparisons to other Housewives who faced legal consequences.) What many are saying is:
“If money was taken from victims, shouldn’t there be some visible effort to make restitution?”
That’s the heart of it.
The Remorse Debate
Here’s the part that fuels the fire more than any court filing: tone.
For some viewers, it’s not just about glam squads and designer looks. It’s about what they perceive as a lack of visible remorse. Reality TV magnifies attitude. A sharp response in a confessional becomes a meme. A defensive reunion moment becomes a narrative.
And when someone says, “People want their money back,” most audiences respond with:
Well… yeah.
Humility, even a small amount, can shift public opinion dramatically. In scandals, perception is currency.
The Law Firm Reality
Another argument fans make is practical:
Running a major law firm isn’t a bottomless pit of cash. There’s payroll. Overhead. Expenses. Staff. Infrastructure. So when millions are flowing into a glam lifestyle, people naturally question sustainability.
That doesn’t automatically equal guilt.
But it does equal scrutiny.
And reality TV thrives on scrutiny.
Why This Story Won’t Go Away
The Erika storyline hits multiple nerves at once:
Wealth and excess
Alleged financial misconduct
Victims waiting for compensation
Public image vs. private truth
It’s not just gossip. It’s ethics wrapped in couture.
That’s why the audience remains divided but passionate. Some defend her right to due process. Others argue that legal technicalities don’t cancel moral accountability.
The Bigger Question
This isn’t just about Erika.
It’s about what viewers expect from public figures when controversy hits.
Do we demand jail time?
Or do we demand humility, restitution, and acknowledgment?
For many RHOBH fans, it’s the second one.
And until that feels resolved — legally or emotionally — this storyline will continue to shadow every reunion couch and every confessional look.
Because at the end of the day, reality TV may be edited…
…but public opinion isn’t.
What do you think?
Is ignorance enough to escape responsibility — or does money always come with strings attached?

You Don’t Gotta Be Smart to Watch It… And That’s the Point

You Don’t Gotta Be Smart to Watch It… And That’s the Point


My Review of Joe’s College Road Trip on Netflix
Listen.
If you’re sitting down expecting Shakespeare, sociology, and a TED Talk about generational trauma — this is not your ministry.
This is a “pass the snacks, hush, and laugh” type of movie.
And honestly? I respect that.
What Is This Movie Really About?
The film follows Joe (yes, THAT Joe from the Tyler Perry universe) taking his grandson on a chaotic road trip to college.
It’s loud.
It’s extra.
It’s petty.
It’s slightly inappropriate.
And it knows exactly what it’s doing.
The whole movie is built on generational shade:
Old school vs Gen Z
“Back in my day” vs “Google it”
Discipline vs “mental health days”
And Joe? Joe is not evolving quietly.
You Don’t Gotta Be Smart to Watch It
Let’s be real.
This is not a think piece.
This is not an Oscar reel.
This is not layered like an A24 indie film.
This is a “sit down and let Joe talk reckless for 90 minutes” situation.
You don’t need:
A degree
A film theory class
A Letterboxd account
You just need:
A sense of humor
A tolerance for chaos
And an understanding that Joe is going to say what everybody’s uncle says at Thanksgiving… but louder.
Who Was This Movie For?
Let’s break it down because I love being messy and analytical at the same time.
This movie was for:
✔️ People who grew up on Tyler Perry stage plays
✔️ Aunties who still say “these kids too soft”
✔️ Folks who think Gen Z needs “a little toughening up”
✔️ Viewers who just want something easy after work
It is NOT for:
❌ Film snobs
❌ People who overanalyze lighting choices
❌ Folks who get offended by old-school humor
❌ Twitter intellectuals looking for symbolism
This movie was made for the living room crowd. The “press play and laugh” demographic.
And it works for that.
The Good, The Petty & The Problematic
The Good:
Joe is still funny. Period.
The back-and-forth between generations feels real.
It moves fast — no dragging, no overthinking.
The Petty:
Some jokes are repetitive.
A few scenes feel like extended skits.
Joe sometimes feels like he’s arguing with the internet.
The Problematic (but on brand):
The humor walks that thin line between “funny uncle” and “why you say that out loud?”
But honestly? That’s the character.
If Joe suddenly became politically correct and emotionally articulate, the internet would be confused.
The Gossip Angle
Let’s talk business.
Tyler Perry knows his audience.
He doesn’t chase film critics.
He feeds the people who have been supporting him for decades.
And guess what? They show up every time.
This isn’t about impressing Hollywood elites.
It’s about keeping his core audience entertained.
And from the streaming numbers? They pressed play.
My Rating: 4.5 Out of 5 ⭐
Yes.
I said 4.5.
Not because it’s cinematic genius.
But because it did exactly what it was supposed to do.
It entertained. It was consistent. It didn’t pretend to be deeper than it was.
Sometimes a movie doesn’t need to change your life. Sometimes it just needs to make you laugh and mind your business.
Final Thoughts
If you go into Joe’s College Road Trip expecting a comedy road trip with loud opinions, generational drama, and unfiltered grandpa energy — you’ll enjoy it.
If you go in expecting depth, subtlety, and character arcs that rival prestige drama… baby, you’re in the wrong car.
Now I’m asking you:
Did Joe go too far?
Or was he just saying what everybody’s thinking but scared to tweet?
Let’s talk in the comments.

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Love After Lockup Season 7, Episode 6 Recap: “Love Does Cost a Thing” — And Baby, The Bill Is Due

Love After Lockup Season 7, Episode 6 Recap: “Love Does Cost a Thing” — And Baby, The Bill Is Due


If there’s one thing Love After Lockup understands, it’s this: romance might be blind… but it is NOT cheap. Season 7, Episode 6 delivered ultimatums, suspicious text messages, family feuds, and enough side-eyes to fill a group chat.
Let’s get into the mess.
๐Ÿ’‹ Kayleigh & Michael: Sexy Time Won’t Fix Family Drama
Kayleigh tried to spice things up with Michael — and I mean spice — hoping that intimacy could smooth over the tension bubbling between their families. Specifically? The moms.
And listen… nothing stresses a fresh-out-the-pen relationship like two grown women arguing about whose baby is more misunderstood.
Kayleigh’s strategy was clear: distract him with love. But here’s the thing — passion is cute, but it doesn’t erase unresolved resentment. You can light candles all you want, but if mama’s still mad, the smoke alarm is going off eventually.
Are they in love? Yes.
Are they stable? Debatable.
๐Ÿšจ Justin & Emily: The Ultimatum Era
Justin officially entered his “I’m tired” phase.
After ongoing tension (and let’s be honest, mismatched energy), Justin hit Emily with an ultimatum. And nothing screams “healthy communication” like someone saying, “It’s this or else.”
Emily’s visit with Justin’s grandmother didn’t help matters. You know when you meet the grandma and she already decided she doesn’t like you? Yeah. That energy.
You could feel Justin pulling away. And when someone fresh out of prison starts pulling away, that’s not just distance — that’s emotional parole.
๐Ÿ“ฑ Felicia & Rich: The Text Message Heard Around the Block
One little text message. That’s all it took.
Rich’s phone became the villain of the episode, and Felicia was NOT here for it. Suspicion crept in fast, and trust started wobbling like a folding chair at a cookout.
In these lockup relationships, trust is already hanging by a thread. Add secretive texting? Baby… that thread is unraveling.
Felicia wants reassurance.
Rich wants freedom.
The math is not mathing.
๐Ÿ‘€ Damond, Goddess & Bonita: A Whole Triangle of Trouble
Damond continues juggling emotions like he’s auditioning for Cirque du Soleil.
He’s trying to charm Goddess, smooth things over, and act like everything’s under control — meanwhile Bonita is scrambling to buy herself time after getting caught in a lie.
When lies start stacking, it’s only a matter of time before somebody pulls receipts.
Damond’s biggest problem? He thinks he can talk his way out of everything.
Sir… this isn’t a courtroom. This is reality TV. And the jury is Twitter.
๐Ÿ” Ayesha & Mikhael: Charges, Questions & Cold Feet
Ayesha started digging deeper into Mikhael’s charges — and what she found didn’t exactly scream “happily ever after.”
Nothing shifts a relationship faster than learning new details about someone’s past. Especially when those details weren’t offered upfront.
She’s in that uncomfortable place where your heart wants one thing, but your brain is yelling, “Run.”
And honestly? The brain usually wins.
๐Ÿ‘‹ Monique’s Surprise Visitor
Monique received an unexpected visitor, and you could feel the tension shift immediately.
Surprise visits on this show never mean cupcakes and balloons. They mean drama, secrets, or someone about to expose something.
Whatever calm she thought she had? It’s gone.
Final Thoughts: Love Costs More Than Money
Episode 6 proved something important:
Love after lockup doesn’t just cost money — it costs trust, patience, emotional maturity, and sometimes your peace.
Some of these couples are trying to build foundations on shaky ground. And you can only ignore cracks for so long before the whole thing starts leaning.
The real question is:
Who’s genuinely in love?
Who’s addicted to the chaos?
And who’s staying just to prove the doubters wrong?
Because right now… it feels like pride is doing more work than love.
What did YOU think about Episode 6?
Was Justin right to give an ultimatum?
Is Felicia overreacting about the text?
And do you think Kayleigh and Michael can survive the mom drama?
Let’s talk about it ๐Ÿ‘€

The Real Housewives of Potomac Season 10, Episode 19 Reunion Part 2: Receipts, Regret & Ruthless Shade

The Real Housewives of Potomac Season 10, Episode 19 Reunion Part 2: Receipts, Regret & Ruthless Shade If you thought Part 1...