Mr. Tendernism Fired? The Smoke, the Trademark, and the $4,000 That Shook the Internet

Mr. Tendernism Fired? The Smoke, the Trademark, and the $4,000 That Shook the Internet

Listen… this story right here? It’s a masterclass in going viral but not owning the building.

The internet has been buzzing about Walter Johnson, bett

er known as Mr. Tendernism, and his firing from Destination Smokehouse — the very place many people say he made famous. And when I say famous, I mean viral clips, millions of views, celebrity pull-ups, and ribs sliding clean off the bone like they signed a release form.

Let’s break this down because this is bigger than barbecue. This is about ownership, contracts, branding, and what happens when personality builds a business… but the paperwork says otherwise.

The Viral Sauce: Walter’s Contribution

First things first: Walter wasn’t just cooking food. He was selling an experience.

The glasses toss. The “Tendernism!” catchphrase. The rib bone falling clean off the meat. The charisma. The energy.

People didn’t just go for brisket. They went for Walter.

According to the breakdown, he was the one who suggested pivoting the coffee shop into a barbecue spot during the pandemic. That idea turned into a viral sensation. But here’s where it gets sticky — while Walter became the face, the hype, and the algorithm’s favorite uncle… he wasn’t listed as an owner.

Not even a partner.

Just the mascot.

And that word right there? Mascot. Whew.

In 2026, when social media can turn anybody into a walking billboard, being “the face” without equity is like paying rent in a house you decorated but don’t own.

The $4,000 Moment: Keith Lee Enters the Chat

Then came the moment that had the internet clutching its pearls.

Keith Lee visited the restaurant. As we all know, a Keith Lee visit can change your entire tax bracket. During his visit, he reportedly tried to hand Walter $4,000 directly.

But Walter was allegedly blocked from coming out.

The optics? Terrible.

The speculation? Immediate.

The internet started asking:

Why couldn’t he accept it?

Who controls the money?

If he’s the reason we’re here, why is he sidelined?

In the world of viral marketing, perception is everything. And this moment made people look deeper into the ownership structure.

The Tendernism Trademark War

Now let’s talk legal smoke.

Walter coined the term “Tendernism.” That’s branding gold. That’s merch. That’s sauces. That’s cookbooks. That’s food trucks. That’s YouTube. That’s a whole lifestyle brand waiting to happen.

But here’s the twist.

There’s a trademark dispute.

Attorney Ken Harris reportedly filed to protect Walter’s rights to the name. Meanwhile, Diamond Smokehouse Enterprises, Inc. (owned by Nick and his mother) also filed for the trademark.

Now we’re in “first use in commerce” territory.

Who used it first? Who filed first? Was it used as an employee? Was it used as an independent personality?

This is why paperwork matters more than applause.

Going viral is cute. Ownership is better.

If you’re building catchphrases, logos, and movements inside someone else’s LLC, and it’s not documented? That can get messy real quick.

Fired… But Not Finished

Despite being fired, Walter isn’t folding.

He’s launching his own food truck. He plans to travel and review small barbecue and soul food spots. He’s focusing on community. On ownership. On building something with his name on it.

And then rapper Cartel Bo stepped in and reportedly bought a restaurant and food truck for Walter in Texas.

That right there? That’s a pivot.

Sometimes being removed is redirection.

The Bigger Lesson (Especially for Creators)

As a blogger in Chicago watching this unfold, I can’t help but see parallels. So many creators build platforms on:

Someone else’s brand

Someone else’s contract

Someone else’s paperwork

And when the views turn into money, the question becomes: who actually owns what?

Walter’s situation feels like a warning sign for:

Influencers

Reality TV personalities

Social media managers

Viral employees

Anyone building a personal brand inside someone else’s company

If your personality is the product, you need protection.

Contracts. Partnership agreements. Revenue splits. Trademark filings. LLC ownership. Clear percentages.

Because when millions of views hit? Feelings don’t matter. Paperwork does.

Was He the Brand or the Employee?

Here’s the real debate.

Was Walter: A) An employee doing his job well? B) A co-creator of the brand’s success? C) The brand itself?

The internet seems to believe it was C.

But legally? That depends on documentation.

And that’s where things get uncomfortable.

Final Thoughts: From Smokehouse to Ownership Era

This story isn’t just about ribs. It’s about equity.

It’s about understanding that viral fame doesn’t equal ownership. It’s about protecting your intellectual property. It’s about not being the mascot in someone else’s million-view moment.

Walter may have been fired. But Mr. Tendernism might be just getting started.

And if he secures that trademark? Baby… Tendernism could turn into a franchise.

Now I want to know:

Do you think Walter should’ve been a partner from the beginning? Or is this just business being business?

Drop your thoughts. Because this one? It’s still cooking.

Belle Collective Season 7, Episode 2: Flowers, Fake Peace & Front-Row Drama

Belle Collective Season 7, Episode 2: Flowers, Fake Peace & Front-Row Drama

Season 7, Episode 2 of Belle Collective proved one thing immediately: this is NOT going to be a quiet season.

If Episode 1 cracked the door open, Episode 2 kicked it clean off the hinges.

And the center of it all?

Lateshia vs. Latrice.

Again.

But this time it felt heavier. More personal. Less “miscommunication” and more “we’ve been holding this in.”

🌸 The Flower Move That Had Everyone Side-Eyeing

Let’s start with the most passive-aggressive move of the night.

Sending flowers… but not showing up.

Now listen — flowers are cute. They’re polite. They say, “I acknowledge the moment.”

But when you skip the event and just send a bouquet? That feels like corporate HR apology behavior.

Lateshia clocked it. The group clocked it. And the viewers definitely clocked it.

Because in reality TV language, that’s saying: “I don’t fool with you, but I’ll look good on camera.”

And that’s where the energy shifted.

🍽️ Friendsgiving Turned Frenemiesgiving

The brunch was supposed to bring people together.

Instead? It brought up everything nobody wanted to talk about.

Shante stepped into the situation and confronted Latrice. And immediately you could feel that tension tighten.

Lateshia made it clear she didn’t send anybody to fight her battles. But once words start flying, it doesn’t matter who sent who.

The vibe went from: “Let’s eat and heal.” To: “Say it with your chest.”

And that’s when the real divide showed up.

💍 Selena’s 50th Birthday… Interrupted

Selena just wanted to celebrate turning 50.

She announced her wedding date. She named her bridal party. She tried to create unity.

And for a split second? It felt grown. Mature. Elevated.

Then boom.

The air got thick.

When Selena attempted to get the ladies to clear the air publicly, it did not go the way she expected. Accusations flew. Denials followed. Voices rose.

And when Latrice let that insult fly in front of everybody?

Yeah.

That wasn’t “let’s circle back later” energy. That was “we are not cool” energy.

👀 The Marriage Talk on the Side

While the women were outside verbally sparring, the husbands were having their own quiet conversation about marriage struggles.

Glen talking about intimacy. Talking about fighting for the relationship. Talking about feeling disconnected.

And honestly? That part felt real.

Because while the group drama is loud, the relationship tension is subtle — and sometimes that’s where the real pressure sits.

You could feel that there’s more going on behind the scenes than just surface arguments.

🎭 What This Episode Really Showed

This episode wasn’t just about who said what.

It showed:

Old wounds still bleeding.

Loyalty being questioned.

Pride getting in the way of peace.

And production knowing exactly where to seat everybody for maximum impact.

Season 7 is not about small misunderstandings.

It’s about trust. It’s about reputation. It’s about who feels betrayed and who feels targeted.

And the fact that this is only Episode 2?

We’re not even at the explosion yet.

We’re just smelling smoke.

🤔 Real Question Though…

Is this feud fixable?

Or are we watching a permanent fracture in the group?

Because once respect feels violated publicly, it’s hard to stitch that back together — especially when cameras are rolling and everybody has receipts.

One thing is clear:

Belle Collective isn’t easing us into this season.

They dropped us right in the middle of it.

And if this energy keeps up?

Season 7 might be the messiest one yet.

Let me ask you —

Was sending flowers enough… or was that a silent shot?

Chaos, Campaigns & Cast Trips: Married to Medicine Season 12 Episodes 7–9 Breakdown

Chaos, Campaigns & Cast Trips: Married to Medicine Season 12 Episodes 7–9 Breakdown

If you thought Married to Medicine was going to give us a calm, professional, “we are doctors and wives” type of season… think again. Episodes 7, 8, and 9 delivered political ambition, fractured friendships, messy trip energy, and apologies that may or may not stick.

Let’s break it all the way down.

Episode 7: Campaigns & Combustion

Dr. Heavenly Kimes said, “I’m not just arguing on YouTube — I’m launching a campaign.” Yes, Heavenly hosted her political campaign event, and instead of unity, we got tension layered with side-eye.

The event should’ve been about growth and leadership. Instead?

Shade between Heavenly and Simone Whitmore reached uncomfortable levels.

Things escalated in a way that made it clear: this isn’t surface drama. This is years of built-up resentment.

Even supportive cast members seemed unsure how to navigate the energy in the room.

The real issue? Respect. Simone clearly feels Heavenly crosses lines. Heavenly feels Simone overreacts. And when two strong personalities refuse to back down, the room gets hot fast.

Episode 8: Girls Trip… Minus the Peace

Enter the Miramar, Florida getaway organized by Contessa Metcalfe. The mission? Healing.

The reality? Awkward room assignments and unresolved tension.

First of all, Heavenly didn’t even show up initially. That alone shifted the dynamic. The group tried to move forward without her, but let’s be honest — when one key player is missing, the tension just sits there waiting.

Meanwhile:

Toya and Angel had their own friction.

Some of the newer dynamics felt cliquey.

The “girls trip” vibe was giving more “corporate retreat gone wrong.”

You could feel the cast trying to decide: Are we fixing this, or are we just filming through it?

Episode 9: The Apology Tour (Sort Of)

And then… Heavenly arrives.

You could almost see Simone Whitmore bracing herself. Because when Heavenly shows up late, she doesn’t tiptoe in quietly — she enters with intention.

Dinner conversations got heavy. Words like “unhinged” were addressed. And in a surprising moment, Heavenly actually apologized.

But here’s the thing about apologies on reality TV:

Are they heartfelt… or strategic?

Jackie Walters stepped into her familiar peacemaker role, trying to guide the conversation toward resolution. Jackie always wants maturity. But maturity only works when both sides truly let go.

Simone accepted the apology — cautiously.

And honestly? That caution makes sense. When hurt has history, one dinner conversation doesn’t erase it.

The Real Question: Is This Friendship Repairable?

What we’re seeing isn’t petty shade. It’s friendship fatigue.

Heavenly and Simone have been through seasons of loyalty, betrayal accusations, YouTube commentary, and off-camera drama. At some point, you have to ask:

Is this a rough patch?

Or is this the beginning of the end?

And let’s not ignore Toya Bush-Harris, who continues to stir things (intentionally or unintentionally). Toya often says what others won’t — but sometimes that just adds gasoline to an already blazing fire.

Final Thoughts

Season 12 is proving something:

These women aren’t just castmates. They have real history. Real businesses. Real marriages. Real reputations.

And when public ambition (like a campaign launch) mixes with personal tension, things get complicated.

Episodes 7–9 felt like a turning point. Either this group evolves… or the cracks widen.

What do you think?

Is Heavenly genuinely trying to grow?

Or is Simone finally reaching her limit?

Because one thing about Married to Medicine — when the friendship fractures, the whole group feels it.

💉 Married to Medicine vs 💅 Baddies: Degrees vs. Drama – Who Really Runs the Reality Streets?

💉 Married to Medicine vs 💅 Baddies: Degrees vs. Drama – Who Really Runs the Reality Streets?

Let’s talk about it.

On one side, we have

women with degrees, businesses, hospitals, and husbands arguing in designer gowns under the Bravo lights.

On the other side, we have women with bundles, booking fees, security guards, and swings arguing in tight dresses under Zeus lighting.

Welcome to the ultimate showdown:

🩺 Married to Medicine

vs

💄 Baddies

And baby… this is not just TV. This is sociology with lashes on.

🩺 Married to Medicine: “I Have a Degree and a Mortgage”

Let’s start classy.

Married to Medicine came on our screens giving us:

Doctors

Doctor’s wives

Businesses

Real marriages

Real divorces

Real tax problems

Real shade

These women fight with words first. They read you politely. They insult you in full sentences. They pull receipts in a PowerPoint tone.

When Dr. Heavenly Kimes says something shady, it sounds like she’s diagnosing you:

“Sweetheart, you need therapy.”

When Quad Webb argues, it sounds like a monologue at the BET Awards.

And let’s not act like they don’t get messy.

They’ve:

Exposed cheating

Dragged each other’s finances

Fought about friendships

Brought up mugshots

Thrown drinks

But they’ll fight and then say:

“Let’s pray about it.”

That’s a different type of chaos.

💄 Baddies: “Security! Roll the Cameras!”

Now enter Baddies.

This show said: “We skipping the therapy. We skipping the prayer. We swinging.”

On Baddies:

You don’t get a sit-down conversation.

You get a hallway run-up.

You don’t get a reunion read.

You get reunion SECURITY.

The Zeus Network said: “Why argue when you can tussle?”

The energy is:

Touring the country

Club appearances

Booking fees

Who gets the bigger room?

Who disrespected who?

Who swung first?

Who threw the wig?

It’s raw. It’s chaotic. It’s loud. It’s viral.

And let’s be honest… people tune in for the fights.

🎭 The Real Difference

Here’s where it gets interesting.

Married to Medicine fights about:

Reputation

Career

Marriage

Status

Respect in professional circles

Baddies fights about:

Respect

Clout

Camera time

Money

Who’s the alpha

One is about maintaining an image. The other is about dominating the moment.

One will argue in a Chanel blazer. The other will argue in Fashion Nova and heels.

But both? Both are fighting for screen time and survival.

💰 Let’s Talk About the Bag

Here’s the shady truth.

Both shows understand one thing:

Conflict = Coins.

On Bravo, if you don’t bring a storyline? You’re gone next season.

On Zeus, if you don’t bring energy? You’re gone mid-season.

It’s the same system. Just different packaging.

📺 Who Looks Better?

That depends on what you value.

If you like:

Career talk

Marriage drama

Strategic shade

Slow burns

You’ll lean toward Married to Medicine.

If you like:

Instant chaos

Viral moments

Club tour drama

Fights every 10 minutes

You’ll lean toward Baddies.

But let’s not act like one is morally superior.

Both are reality TV. Both amplify drama. Both profit off conflict.

One just does it in a doctor’s office. The other does it in a tour bus.

🤭 The Shady Question Nobody Wants to Ask

Are we watching empowerment…

Or are we watching Black women fight for entertainment?

Because if we’re being real…

Both shows have moments where you laugh, gag, and clutch your pearls — but sometimes you also wonder:

Who’s protecting these women? Who’s producing this chaos? Who benefits the most?

🎬 Final Thoughts

Married to Medicine is polished drama. Baddies is street survival drama.

One argues with vocabulary. One argues with velocity.

But both? Both understand the assignment.

And the assignment is: Stay relevant. Stay loud. Stay booked.

Now let me ask you…

If these two casts had a joint reunion?

Who would win: The degrees or the knuckles? 😏

Jennifer Hudson vs Beyoncé: VOCAL BATTLE OR DIFFERENT LANES?

Jennifer Hudson vs Beyoncé: VOCAL BATTLE OR DIFFERENT LANES?

Alright. Let’s talk about it.

Every few months, the internet dusts off the same debate: JHUD vs Beyoncé.

Who sings better? Who’s more iconic? Who wins in a vocal battle?

But here’s the real tea…

They’re not even in the same lane.

And that’s not shade — that’s strategy.

🎤 VOCALS: The Church vs The Studio Queen

Jennifer Hudson is a vocal assassin.

When she opens her mouth, it feels like Sunday morning at 10:45 AM and the choir director just told everybody to stand up.

Big, booming belts

Gospel roots

Emotional runs

Broadway control

She’s the type to sing one note and make you rethink your entire life.

Now Beyoncé?

Beyoncé is not trying to out-scream or out-belt Jennifer Hudson. That’s not her ministry.

Layered harmonies

Studio perfection

Breath control

Precision and control

Athletic stamina while dancing in 6-inch heels

Beyoncé will give you vocals while doing choreography that would send most people to urgent care.

So when people say, “Well JHUD can sing circles around Beyoncé” — okay… in a straight vocal belt-off? Maybe.

But can JHUD do a full stadium tour dancing non-stop for two and a half hours?

That’s a different conversation.

👑 STAR POWER: Who Owns the Moment?

Let’s be honest.

Beyoncé is a cultural machine.

Visual albums

Global tours

Fashion influence

Business empire

The “don’t play with her” fan base

She doesn’t just release music. She releases eras.

Meanwhile, Jennifer Hudson owns:

Broadway stages

Award shows

National anthems

The talk show couch

And she’s literally an EGOT winner.

Yes. EGOT.

That’s not accidental. That’s range.

🎬 CAREER PATHS: Pop Superstar vs Prestige Powerhouse

Beyoncé built an empire from girl group to global domination. She mastered pop, R&B, visual storytelling, and branding.

Jennifer Hudson built a prestige career — film, theater, awards, powerhouse ballads.

It’s like comparing:

A stadium world tour

to

A standing ovation at the Oscars.

Both are elite.

Just different atmospheres.

💬 WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP COMPARING THEM?

Because the internet loves competition.

Two successful Black women?

“Oh let’s rank them.”

But the truth?

One is a vocal powerhouse rooted in gospel and Broadway tradition.

The other is a pop cultural architect who blends vocals, visuals, and performance.

This isn’t Mariah vs Whitney territory.

This is apples and couture oranges.

🧠 MY TAKE?

If we’re talking raw vocal power in a church-down, mic-in-hand moment?

Jennifer Hudson might take that.

If we’re talking global impact, branding, choreography, visuals, and full performance package?

Beyoncé clears.

But here’s the twist…

Why do we need one to lose?

❓ Let Me Ask You:

Are we comparing them because they’re both Black women who sing…

Or because the internet needs a winner?

Drop your opinion:

Team JHUD 🎤

Team Beyoncé 👑

Or Team “Stop Comparing Grown Successful Women”

Because honestly?

Both are winning.

And that’s the real headline.

Former Michigan Coach in Legal Hot Water: What Really Happened?

Former Michigan Coach in Legal Hot Water: What Really Happened?

The football world is no stranger to scandal, but when headlines started circulating about former Sherrone Moore, things took a sharp turn from sports talk to courtroom drama.

Moore, once head coach at University of Michigan, was fired in December 2025 following allegations of an inappropriate workplace relationship with his executive assistant, Paige Shiver. What started as an internal investigation has now spiraled into a criminal case with serious implications.

Let’s break this down.

The Relationship That Sparked It All

According to reports, Moore and Shiver initially denied having a relationship when the university launched its investigation. That denial didn’t hold for long. After the couple reportedly broke up, Shiver admitted that the relationship had in fact occurred.

And that’s where things begin to shift.

Workplace relationships—especially between a high-ranking coach and an executive assistant—are already a red flag in most professional settings. Power dynamics matter. Transparency matters. And when you deny something during an investigation? That only complicates the situation further.

Moore ultimately lost his job over the matter.

But losing his position wasn’t the end of the story.

The Alleged Apartment Incident

After being fired, Moore allegedly entered Shiver’s apartment without permission and threatened self-harm. That claim escalated the case from professional misconduct to potential criminal behavior.

Shiver’s civil attorney, Heidi Sharp, reportedly contacted police following the incident.

If true, that’s extremely serious.

However—this is where the case becomes complicated.

Disputed Evidence & Conflicting Narratives

Moore’s attorney is pushing back hard.

According to the defense, attorney Heidi Sharp allegedly provided police with inaccurate or unverified information. Moore’s legal team argues that some of the text messages labeled as harassment were actually work-related communications.

In addition, twelve unanswered phone calls made by Moore were included in the warrant application—but their purpose remains unclear. Were they professional follow-ups? Personal attempts at contact? Something else entirely?

Intent matters. Context matters.

And right now, that context appears to be in dispute.

The “Crucial Omission” That Could Change Everything

Here’s where it gets legally technical—but extremely important.

The officer who obtained the arrest warrant allegedly failed to inform the judge that Moore and Shiver had a professional relationship.

That omission is significant. In stalking or harassment cases, the prior relationship between the two parties is highly relevant. It can impact how repeated contact is interpreted.

Moore’s attorney argues that leaving out that information could have influenced the judge’s decision to issue the warrant in the first place.

And the judge agreed—at least enough to call for further examination.

The Judge’s Decision

Rather than immediately siding with prosecutors, the judge has ordered an evidentiary hearing scheduled for March 2nd.

This hearing will examine whether information was intentionally withheld from the magistrate when the warrant was issued.

If the court determines that key facts were omitted in bad faith, the charges could potentially be dismissed.

But here’s the twist: even if the charges are dismissed, prosecutors could refile them.

So this isn’t over.

Not by a long shot.

Bigger Questions at Play

This case raises uncomfortable but necessary questions:

When workplace relationships cross professional boundaries, who bears responsibility?

Should universities implement stricter policies to prevent these dynamics?

How do courts balance emotional situations with criminal standards?

And what happens when alleged omissions affect an arrest warrant?

Beyond the football headlines, this is about power, accountability, legal procedure, and credibility.

What Happens Next?

All eyes are now on the March 2nd evidentiary hearing.

If the judge finds that the warrant process was flawed, Moore could see charges dismissed—for now. If not, the case moves forward.

Either way, this situation has already reshaped Moore’s career and reputation.

And it serves as a reminder: what happens off the field can be just as consequential as what happens on it.

What do you think?

Should workplace relationships automatically lead to termination in high-profile positions? Or does this case feel more complicated than that?

Let’s talk in the comments.

🌴 Summer House: Martha’s Vineyard – Wrong Time, Wrong Formula, Wrong Road?

🌴 Summer House: Martha’s Vineyard – Wrong Time, Wrong Formula, Wrong Road?

When Summer House: Martha's Vineyard premiered, it should have been a cultural moment. A group of successful, attractive Black professionals vacationing in Martha’s Vineyard? Historic. Elevated. Necessary.

But instead of fireworks… we got fizzling sparklers.

Let’s talk about it.

⏰ Wrong Time on TV?

The biggest issue? Placement.

Coming off the heels of heavy-hitting drama from The Real Housewives of Potomac, viewers were already emotionally full. RHOP brings:

Betrayals

Shade assassinations

Real friendships turned enemies

Meme-worthy one-liners

Then Martha’s Vineyard comes on with calm beach conversations and “let’s discuss our feelings.”

The energy shift was drastic.

Reality TV is about momentum. If you feed audiences filet mignon drama, you can’t immediately follow it with cucumber salad vibes.

Timing matters.

💔 The Real Problem: No Dating, No Stakes

Let’s be honest.

Summer House (the original) thrives because:

People hook up.

People fight.

People regret hooking up.

Then they hook up again.

Romantic tension fuels the chaos.

But on Martha’s Vineyard?

Season 1: Very little cross-dating.

Season 2: Producers clearly tried to “match-fix” situations.

And when producers start pushing storylines, viewers can feel it.

It went from:

“We’re organic friends on vacation.”

To:

“Okay… who’s dating who this season? Somebody kiss somebody.”

And when the cast isn’t naturally connecting romantically, the show starts to feel forced.

🎭 Producers vs. Cast: Who’s Steering the Boat?

Here’s the uncomfortable question:

Did producers try to engineer chemistry that wasn’t there?

Because you could feel the setup energy in Season 2. Conversations felt strategic. Pairings felt encouraged. Drama felt… nudged.

But you can’t manufacture sparks if the cast doesn’t genuinely like each other like that.

And that’s not necessarily the cast’s fault.

These weren’t messy 23-year-olds trying to figure life out.

These were grown professionals protecting their reputations.

That changes everything.

🏖️ Too Much of Nothing?

The show leaned heavily into:

“Black excellence”

Generational wealth discussions

Vineyard history

Relationship therapy-style conversations

And while those conversations matter…

Reality TV needs balance.

You need:

Fun

Flirting

Petty arguments

Silly jealousy

A little delusion

Instead, sometimes it felt like a brunch panel discussion with cocktails.

🚧 The Wrong Road for This Cast

Maybe the issue wasn’t timing.

Maybe it was format.

What if Martha’s Vineyard would have thrived as:

A docu-series about Black vacation culture?

A luxury lifestyle series?

A couples retreat show?

Or even something closer to a travel + friendship vibe?

Trying to force it into the traditional Summer House chaos formula might’ve been the misstep.

Because these cast members weren’t trying to ruin their careers for a meme moment.

And that restraint showed.

💭 So What Went Wrong?

Was it:

The scheduling after RHOP?

Lack of organic dating?

Producer interference?

Or a cast too polished for messy reality TV?

The concept was strong. The location was beautiful. The representation mattered.

But execution? Questionable.

🗣️ My Final Thought

Martha’s Vineyard wasn’t bad.

It just wasn’t chaotic enough for the franchise it was attached to.

And when viewers expect fireworks, you can’t give them soft jazz and expect applause.

What do you think?

Did Martha’s Vineyard get a fair shot…

or was it always headed down the wrong road? 🌴